<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Development Flow</title>
		<link>http://www.peoplesoftwiki.com/forum/t-157492/development-flow</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Development Flow&quot; - How do you develop in PeopleSoft?</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:06:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.peoplesoftwiki.com/forum/t-157492#post-486726</guid>
				<title>Development Flow</title>
				<link>http://www.peoplesoftwiki.com/forum/t-157492/development-flow#post-486726</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 01:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Praj</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>52320</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I'm using the term development flow to refer to the way in which you develop in PeopleSoft.</p> <p>A typical approach is something like this:</p> <ol> <li>Develop in your master development environment</li> <li>Migrate to your development testing environment</li> <li>Test in your development testing environment</li> </ol> <p>For basic development, this approach works fine. However, I find that for more complex development, I like this approach better:</p> <ol> <li>Prototype in a prototype/sandbox development environment.</li> <li>Once you are happy with your prototype and have performed some basic tests, recreate (do not migrate) the changes in your master development environment.</li> <li>Migrate to your development testing environment</li> <li>Test in your development testing environment</li> </ol> <p>The prototype first approach works really well when you aren't sure what your final solution will look like and you need to <em>feel</em> your way towards it. It does however require three development environments instead of two.</p> <p>Everyone is different, but I figure it's useful to know how different people work. If you have a different approach or suggestion, please comment.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>
